top of page
Search

The Concert Conundrum: Lack of Talent in Openers and the Rise of Lazy Promoters



The vibrant energy of a live concert, the electrifying atmosphere, and the connection between the artist and the audience make live performances an integral part of the music industry. However, in recent times, the concert experience has faced challenges stemming from the lack of talent in opening acts and the concerning trend of lazy promoters prioritizing profits over genuine musical experiences. This article explores the detrimental effects of these issues on the concert ecosystem and highlights the importance of supporting deserving artists for the enrichment of the entire industry.


Openers play a critical role in setting the tone for a live concert. They provide an opportunity for emerging artists to showcase their talent to a broader audience, build a fan base, and gain valuable experience. Traditionally, opening acts were carefully selected based on their musical compatibility with the headlining artist, creating a seamless transition from one performance to the next.


In recent years, the quality of opening acts has been called into question. Many concert-goers have reported lackluster performances, leaving them unimpressed and disconnected from the experience. This decline in quality can be attributed to several factors, including the oversaturation of the music market, resulting in a flood of emerging artists vying for limited opportunities. Consequently, not all opening acts are fully prepared for the rigors of a live performance, leading to lackluster shows that fail to engage the audience.



Another pressing concern is the rise of lazy promoters who prioritize profits over curating a memorable concert experience. Many promoters are increasingly booking artists based on their marketability rather than their talent and musical compatibility with the headliner. This approach often results in a mismatched lineup that fails to resonate with the audience, leaving concert-goers disappointed and disillusioned.


Additionally, some promoters are charging artists exorbitant fees to secure opening slots, essentially turning the concert stage into a pay-to-play platform. This practice not only exploits emerging artists struggling to make a name for themselves but also perpetuates a culture where the music industry is seen as profit-driven rather than artist-centered.


The decline in the quality of opening acts and the profit-driven practices of lazy promoters have broader implications for the music industry as a whole. Talented emerging artists are denied the opportunity to showcase their craft, hindering the industry's overall diversity and creativity. Moreover, concert-goers who attend lackluster shows might become disillusioned with live performances, leading to a decline in ticket sales and overall revenue for both artists and promoters.


**The Call for Change**


To address these challenges, a multifaceted approach is necessary. Concert promoters must prioritize the curation of diverse and compatible lineups that provide a cohesive and enriching experience for attendees. Additionally, artists and audiences alike can play a role in demanding better quality from opening acts and raising awareness about the importance of supporting deserving artists.


**Conclusion**


The concert experience is a symbiotic relationship between artists and audiences, and both deserve the best possible experience. The decline in talent among opening acts and the prevalence of profit-driven practices among promoters threaten to undermine this relationship. By promoting a more artist-centered approach and demanding better quality from promoters, we can work toward reviving the concert ecosystem, fostering emerging talent, and ensuring that live performances remain a vibrant and cherished part of the music industry.

14 views0 comments
bottom of page